April 19, 2024

Please follow & like us :)

Twitter
Facebook
RSS

15-Jun-16: What do the Palestinian Arabs think?

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/jNPo/~3/v4cXvstgW4M/15-jun-16-what-do-palestinian-arabs.html
Gazan Palestinian Arabs dance for joy as word gets out of a terrorist
massacre in a Jerusalem synagogue, November 18, 2014 [Image Source: AP]

Unless a person makes an effort to be an expert on such matters, it can be confusing to know what views Palestinian Arabs hold. But not impossible. Not at all.

This isn’t for lack of reliable, credible data. Plenty of it is there, and has been for years, based on polls conducted by professional Arab organizations using solid polling techniques and respectable science.

The problem – and there are plenty – is more that analysts tend to attribute views to the Palestinian Arabs based on speeches of prominent figures, interviews with officials and (forgive us) a degree of wishful or even malicious thinking and even up being certain of things that look suspiciously unsupported. We prefer looking at the data.

We have published data-based views in the past. See –

On the whole, for those of us hoping for peaceful relations and better lives for everyone impacted by the conflict, what the data show is depressing, frustrating, even chilling. 

Now the latest installment.

We have just looked at recent polling data on the current views of Palestinian Arabs. This time, it’s based on a report, Palestinian Public Opinion Poll No. 60, published a week ago by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), headed by Dr. Khalil Shikaki. (We have looked at their previous findings in those posts we just listed above.) This newest poll was carried out among Arabs in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip between June 2 and June 4, 2016. Total sample size was 1,270 adults, interviewed face to face in 127 randomly selected locations. (Margin of error is 3%.)
Shikaki [Image Source]

To us, it seems the way the findings are expressed often tends to obscure rather than clarify. 

For instance, when the summary at the top of the report says the poll data show “a continued and significant drop, particularly in the West Bank, in support for stabbing attacks…”, many of us will detect a flutter of optimism in our breasts. 

But then you look at the numbers. 

The pollsters measure a thing they call “Support for use of knives in the current confrontations with Israel“. It’s actually something simpler: Indeed, there’s been a drop in the past 90 days: it’s come tumbling down from 44% to 36% among West Bank Arabs. And from 82% to 75% in the Gaza Strip. It’s technically a fall alright. But it means 56% of the Arabs on the other side of the fence favour stabbing Jews to death, to use a less-adorned term. 

And to hammer home the seriousness of that Palestinian Arab devotion to murder, support for the cowardly bombing attack on a Jerusalem city bus [“21-Apr-16: The Hamas jihadists claim the Jerusalem bus bombing as one of their own“] in the Talpiot neighbourhood of the capital, injuring some 20 ordinary Israelis, was supported by 65% of the Palestinian Arab respondents. If there’s some logic to favoring bombings to knifings, the pollsters did not explore it or reveal what they learned.

Israelis are frequently told that Mahmoud Abbas is a peace partner, the peace partner, and even though there has never been the slightest shred of evidence that he wants to reach a compromise settlement with the Israelis or even could given the belligerence among the people he rules, he is a man seriously lacking in support from his own ranks. 

Consistent with one after another past polls, the latest numbers show

two thirds demand Abbas resignation, Fatah has not gained any additional support during the last three months, and a majority of Palestinians believes that the PA has become a burden on the Palestinian people… Level of satisfaction with the performance of president Abbas stands at 34%…

Dissatisfaction is related to the sense that their lives are mired in corruption80% says the PA’s institutions are corrupt. And they are astute enough to understand that press freedom is not going to make things better. Only 17% say there is press freedom in the West Bank. In the Gaza Strip, even less: 16%.

Abbas: A steady two-thirds of his constituency want to see him quit
and go home and take the corruption with him [Image Source]
Who would replace Abbas? Here’s the current field: 
Marwan Barghouti 30%
Ismail Haniyeh (Hamas) 22%
Rami al Hamdallah 6%
Khalid Mashaal 5%
Mustapha Barghouti 5%
Mohammad Dahlan 5%
Saeb Erekat 2%
Salam Fayyad 2%
Any Israeli government making concessions to a political figure as despised and disregarded as Abbas is would be guilty of reckless mismanagement of their electoral mandate. 

Ignoring that reality, the pollsters pushed on, examining how Palestinian Arabs view next steps, on the demonstrably safe assumption of an “absence of peace negotiations“. Return to an armed intifada” gets 54%, compared with 56% three months ago. So are we closer to, or further away from, things getting worse?
More than half (56%) want the Palestinian Authority to abandon the Oslo agreement today (63% held that view 90 days ago). Walking away from the Oslo agreement gets slightly more support among West Bank Arabs (57%) than among Gazans (55%).

(And as a by-the-way: Which US presidential candidate is seen as better for the Palestinian Arabs? 12% said Clinton. 7% went for Trump.)


We quoted Dr Daniel Polisar when we last looked at PSR polling data [see “03-Nov-15: What do they mean when the Palestinian Arabs say they oppose terror?“]. His views added a lot to our understanding, so we went looking again just now at his most recent analysis. Writing in the wake of last week’s terror attack on the Sorona Market complex in central Tel Aviv [Palestinian public opinion is behind Tel Aviv terror attack”, Times of Israel, June 10, 2016], he made some sharp observations about how Pal Arab public opinion has evolved in the past years, which we summarize:
  • There is a clear pattern of what he terms “sympathy and even adulation” among ordinary Palestinian Arabs for bloody attacks directed at Jews. How this works – at the “in principle” level and when actual terrorist outrages are done – is truly disturbing.
  • In PSR’s September 2004 survey, in-principle support for armed attacks on Israeli civilians stood at 54%. When asked how they felt about a specific bombing attack carried out in Be’er Sheba a few weeks before the poll, in which 16 Israelis were murdered, support sky-rocketed to 77%. 
  • PSR’s June 2006 poll found about a slightly higher level of general support for terror attacks on Israeli civilians: 56%. Questioned about a specific terror bombing in Tel Aviv attack two months before, with a death toll of 11 Israelis, support zoomed to 69%.
  • PSR’s March 2008 poll found general support for terror attacks on civilians reached an all-time high of 67%. There had been two terror attacks just before the polling. One was a bombing on Israelis in Dimona during February: 78% said they were in favor of that. Then there was a much more lethal terror attack on a high school for religious boys in Jerusalem [see “9-Mar-08: Terrorism. Their world. Our world.“]: eight Israeli children were murdered. Support for that specific atrocity (children!) was measured at the stratospheric level of 84%. 
  • PSR stopped asking about specific terror attacks after that. Perhaps they were embarrassed. Perhaps the results generated negative feedback. We don’t know.
  • Since August 2014, PSR has done eight more polls, each one including a question about Palestinian Arab respondents’ attitudes to “attacks against Israeli civilians within Israel”. Each time, the majority expressed support.
In the March 2016 poll, the last time this question was asked, 60% of Palestinians backed such attacks. He notes, as most of us would probably agree, that there are

good reasons to expect, or at least to hope, that support for a concrete case of violence would be lower than for attacks against civilians in general. After all, it is one thing to favor in principle the use of bombs or guns against Israeli civilians and something else, after seeing coverage of the grisly results of a particular suicide-bombing, to declare one’s support. But in practice, the opposite effect can be observed…  Disturbingly, this pattern has been consistent during the past decade and a half, with only a brief exception, as high percentages of Palestinians have supported terror attacks on Israeli civilians in general, while even higher percentages have backed specific bombings and shootings that killed and wounded Israelis.

Here’s what we said when we last looked at the poll numbers. We believe, and the polling data bear it out consistently over years, that when columnists and analysts speak of the desire of Palestinian Arabs to live in peace, to get on with ordinary, quiet, constructive lives – as compelling as this interpretation is, the data don’t support it

Anyone paying attention to the incitement pumped, generation after generation, into their communities and heads will not be surprised. What the people living on the other side of the fence are saying is clear, credible and measurable. Being optimistic about the prospects for the sort of painful compromise that leads to peaceful relations is counterfactual and foolish, as much as we wish it were otherwise

That’s a message we wish the public figures pushing their “peace plans” would internalize.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*