March 28, 2024

Please follow & like us :)

Twitter
Facebook
RSS

07-Oct-19: How hard is it to produce 12 year old knife-attackers?

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/jNPo/~3/r3YN11ZbcDw/07-oct-19-how-hard-is-it-to-produce-12.html
We don”t claim to be 100% sure but a social media post [here]
suggests this is the stabber described in our post.
The world-class treatment he’s getting is courtesy of
Shaarei Zedek Medical Center and the government of Israel

With a current news item in mind, here’s some insight into how the Palestinian Authority’s policy of child weaponization works.

We wrote here a week and a half ago [“27-Sep-19: Weaponized Palestinian Arab children and more Arab-on-Israel stabbings“] about an on-duty female member of the Israel Police being injured in the course of a frenzied stabbing attack launched by a Palestinian Arab boy of thirteen. We were wrong: he was twelve. And it’s evident he didn’t intend to inflict mild trauma. He was very likely intent on killing.

The boy apppeared in court yesterday.

12-year-old indicted for Jerusalem attack in which officer was lightly injured | Boy charged with terror offenses for attempting to stab police officers in Old City last month; female officer was lightly hurt when barrier fell on her hand during scuffle | Times of Israel | 6 October 2019 | The Jerusalem district attorney on Sunday indicted a 12-year-old boy under terror laws for the attempted stabbing of a policewoman in Jerusalem’s Old City last month.
According to the indictment, on September 26, the day of the attack, the minor attended prayers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount. At the conclusion of prayers, he allegedly walked up to a group of female officers at the Temple Mount’s Chain Gate, above the Western Wall area, pulled out a knife and attempted to stab the officers. During the ensuing scuffle, a female officer, age 34, was lightly injured when a security barrier fell on her hand. According to the indictment, a staff member of the Waqf, the Muslim trust that oversees the site, tried to catch the boy and keep the police from him.
The boy was overpowered at the scene and arrested.
The boy is accused of committing an act of terror in which he unlawfully attempted to injure a person with a knife for religious and national motive. Prosecutors asked that the boy remain detained until the end of legal proceedings.

There’s no indication whether the Waqf worker who tried to prevent the police from taking the stabber into custody will face criminal or terror charges. If he’s not, that’s disturbing.

Here’s some of the background that put the boy in the photo above into, first, an Israeli hospital bed and then Israel’s juvenile criminal justice system where he’s now fated to spend some of what should have been his best years.

First, let’s understand the meaning of Waqf, an Arabic term defined [Wikipedia] as “confinement and prohibition” or causing a thing to stop or stand still. In the legal sense, it is said to mean the detention of a specific thing for purposes of “charity of poors [sic] or other good objects“.

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan imposed a waqf on Jerusalem after the invasion by its British-led army, and the subsequent two-decade long massively-destructive conquest and occupation, of the West Bank and East Jerusalem in the wake of the 1948 Israeli War of Independence.

After East Jerusalem was liberated in the course of the June 1967 Six-Day War, Israel – for pragmatic reasons related to its desire for neighborly relations and respect for Muslim sensibilities – allowed the waqf to re-assert its authority over the Temple Mount, which happens to be Judaism’s holiest site.
Jordan’s King Abdullah II “currently supplies all of the funding needed to operate the waqf.” But as a recent analysis of changes in its structure shows, [“New Waqf Council Managing the Temple Mount“, JCPA – Nadav Shragai, Lenny Ben-David | February 28, 2019], the Waqf is poised to do more harm:

The main, most dramatic change in the composition of the Waqf… was the joining of Sheikh Akram Sabri, currently chairman of the Supreme Muslim Council and former Mufti of Jerusalem. Sabri is now identified with the Muslim Brotherhood’s “the northern faction of the Islamic Movement” in Israel, and he follows the orders of Turkey and its President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Some also believe that he is close to Hamas. At the beginning of the second intifada, Sabri identified with suicide bombings, and he is known for his extreme pronouncements against Israel… Other new members of the Jordanian Waqf, who Jordan agreed to allow into the new council after it was expanded from 11 members to 18 are mainly affiliated with Fatah and the Palestinian Authority… Until the establishment of the new Waqf, most of its members were pro-Jordanian. Its new composition expresses a united front [among] the Palestinian Authority, Fatah, and people like Sheikh Akram Sabri – and anyone who fears for Jordan’s future status on the Temple Mount. It is a joint coalition against the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Israel.

The weaponization of Palestinian Arab children by the kleptocratic/geriatric Mahmoud Abbas regime that rules them is the result of several concurrent strategies that have been implemented for years by now:
  • Large long-term monthly payments to prisoners and the families of dead terrorists by the Palestinian Authority, funded from a deficit budget that is replenished via foreign aid grants to the PA. These Pay-to-Slay payments as they are comminly termed grow with the seriousness of the terror offense. 
  • Overt, explicit incitement to more acts of terror by the Palestinian Authority and by terror groups
  • The recruiting and training of children to engage in conflict: Special mention to the United Nations UNRWA people responsible these past seven decades for nurturing, preserving, perpetuating and legitimizing the violent discontent of Palestinian Arab schookl children.
  • The systematic glorification of Arab-on-Israeli violence throughout Palestinian Arab society
  • The deliberate, ideology-driven abandonment of weaponized Palestinian Arab children by the numerous child-protection agencies that raise billions each year on the profoundly dishonest premise that, like DCI Palestine, they are “committed to securing a just and viable future for Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory“.
With all these in place, getting to the results they want are not that challenging.

Israel attracts serious criticism for its treatment of child offenders. In large measure, this is dishonest, politically-spun and based on poorly understood data. For instance, as a respected human rights organization based in Israel reported in February 2018 [NGO Monitor] in an essay that contradicts some of what “everyone knows” about Israel’s “failures“:

  • Some 90,000 children aged between 10 and 17 were arrested in England and Wales between April 2015 and March 2016, an average of about 7,500 per month. Adjust these numbers for population and you can make this highly relevant comparison – that minors are arrested in England and Wales (where armed conflict is not a major feature of life) 5.5 times more often than Palestinian Arabs living in the so-called West Bank are.
  • In data covering the years since since 2013 (a period marked by considerable violence and the massive promotion of terror we mentioned above), the number of Palestinian Arab minors arrested annually in areas under Israeli control was between 800 and 1,000. 
  • Of these arrested, how many were subjected to prosecution? About 450-505. Thus on average, in a population of roughly a million minors (quoting Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics data), fewer than 85 such minors are arrested each month and fewer than half of those are prosecuted.
  • And this: International law and Article 66 of the Fourth Geneva Convention mandates that Israel must establish military courts as part of its obligation to “take all the measures in [its] power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety.” Moreover, Israel’s law and enforcement practices meet all the requirements of “due process,” the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Article 68 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The rules of evidence applied by the Military Courts are the same as the rules of evidence applied in the Israeli domestic criminal justice system.
These are generally not points that the chorus of child-weaponizers and their foreign-government-funders, backers and advocates want us to know. Nor do they advertise just how easy it is, given their massive investment until now, it is to weaponize pre-teen boys and girls and turn them into killers.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*