UN Watch noticed something that is more than creepy:
But, as UN Watch notes, the original article title questioning whether Egypt’s Jews were expelled in its headline was “liked” by the Amnesty UN account.
Now, Amnesty is no fan of Egypt. It regularly tweets and writes reports that are anti-Egypt.
And the Egyptian Jews who were forced to leave Egypt (there are only a handful of old women left out of 80,000 in 1948) were not generally Zionists.
So why would Amnesty “like” an article that calls into question the Jewish narrative of what happened to the now disappeared Jewish community of Egypt?
Amnesty never, ever questions the narrative of persecuted groups or minorities. It always goes after the big, evil governments. Its entire goal is to protect the rights of the persecuted, not the persecutors.
Except for this one, singular, time. When the persecuted minority are Jews.
Amnesty’s tweet reveals its true nature of antisemitism. The idea that Jews are lying about their history of being persecuted by Arabs is too delicious for the famed NGO to let go. The community that was destroyed is populated by criminal liars, and the ethnic cleansers are the innocent victims of Jewish slander.
Amnesty UN has since “unliked” the tweet. But that is because of fear of embarrassment, not because of any moral problems with the tweet. The baseline thinking of the Amnesty tweeter, which is utterly consistent with everything else we’ve seen from that organization, is a dislike for Jews, usually demonstrated by its focus on Israel beyond nearly every country with serious human right abuses.
Twitter is great because it reveals the subconscious thinking of the tweeter. In this case, it showed in no uncertain terms that Amnesty considers Jews to be, by default, liars whose persecutions have been exaggerated or invented.
That’s pretty antisemitic.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Leave a Reply